"Close up" sounds

[hornyears]

Over the years, the truly memorable phonesex encounters that were amazingly erotic where the ones where the woman on the other end put the phone up to her pussy and you could hear her fingers or dildo moving in and out of herself, making the wet squishy sound that is just amazing.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about. It's an older clip and I'm not sure where I got it. Anyone out there have anything similar?

[yeppie]

similar to scott, i don

[hornyears]

Now I find that rather interesting. To me the phonesex (real, not paid, heh) has always been enticing to me, maybe more so because its even encountered less than actual live sex sounds. I have followed the alt.binaries.sounds.erotica group off and on over the years and have been surpised by the general lack of phonesex recordings. I guess I'm in a minority.

Now, the upside to all this is that I find all the other live sounds just as hot. I'm not embarrassed to say that in addition to sex, I've always had a thing for standing outside a bathroom door and hearing a woman pee. I'm in a situation now where I think I can start to get some pretty good recordings if anyone is interested.

Here's another that is kind of a closeup sound from a couple years ago that I got lucky/unlucky with since it was supposed to be a video. I had a small Hi-8 camcorder next to the bed of my roommate's room hoping to catch them having sex. His girlfriend was basically living there at the time and I snooped and found they had a couple dildos. One night he was out late apparently and she masturbated before he got home. The angle was bad and I only got the side of the bed, but here is what I could hear at the end. Heh, its got a little metallic echo from being inside the vent.

[yeppie]

thanks again, hornyears, i enjoyed that story. i

[hornyears]

Well, I think if we were to consider my roommate a "neighbor across the hall" then by all means, that's Neighborsex! Heh. By all means move.

[yeppie]

thanks hornyears for clearing.
i

[sc0tt-uk]

hornyears - what a catch!!!
I'd definitely be interested to hear more of that session, as well as any other stuff you've got that falls under the neighborsex category.

just one suggestion - you could encode these files at a much lower bitrate without losing any of the good stuff. Most microphones are mono, so generally theres not a lot of point in these files being stereo. Also the 192 kbit could be dropped to 64 or maybe 96 if you find 64 kbit loses anything (on a file like this i wouldn't expect it to be a problem). as long as you keep your encoder set to 44.1 KHZ those settings probably won't sound much different, but the file sizes will be reduced significantly!!

I've got company here at the mo so i can't do much, but give me a few days and i think i might have two recordings that will be of interest to you. I'll dig them up when i get some time alone. its about time i posted something new anyway.

Lookin forward to the next one already...
sc0tt-uk

[hornyears]

Well, I am an audiophile at heart. Nothing over the top, but I can tell a massive difference between say a mp3 at 192kbps and at 128kbps. Now granted, the stereo vs. mono issue is a good point and I'll save some as mono. But, even the sound artifacts at 192 kind of bug me and I prefer a lossless compression but those would be huge.

I'll also switch to a variable bitrate instead of a constant one and that should help with file sizes as well. Hopefully I'll have a new post up soon.

[sc0tt-uk]

good point about switching to VBR. Looks like you know more than most about this stuff - sorry if my last post seemed patronising.

Yep i'd join you on going lossless if there was no filesize limit, particularly for the neighborsex stuff thats got environment as part of the recording.

oh while i'm here i just thought of something. you might already know this, but the bitrate is spread between channels. Damn would've thought that I could explain this better, i had to do a huge writeup about it at uni LOL. What i'm trying to say is, that if you're going to switch your encoder to mono, then you'll only be needing half the bitrate of a stereo encode to get the equivelant sound. so if I were to encode your last post from the original source to 96 kbit mono, it'd be the equivelant of encoding from the same source as 192 stereo... the bitrate is halved but theres only 1 channel's worth of data to encode this time. The file is much smaller for it, but you're left with the same artifacts and whatnot that you had in your 192 stereo encode.

Just thought it was worth pointing out, even if you already knew it might be useful to someone whos trying to fit a longer file up here without multiple posts in future.

You never said if you've got any other neighborsex style stuff hornyears... made any other lucky catches?
sc0tt-uk

[Audio]

hornyears

for these kinds of recordings check out the "angel" and "kristy" recordings on the site (probably now in the archives)