Community of Sexsoundlovers

"failed to launch" dates

Again, this is where DXM likely shines. Not only his size.... but good at doing fun mind games with the ladies too.

sexyreadhead wrote:

dxm2 wrote:I think pretty much all women tell every guy they like that he is big, because they all know that's what you tell guys you like.

speaking on behalf of myself and pretty much all my female friends, this is actually pretty true.

i once made the mistake of telling a guy who kept insisting that i tell him the truth that, yeah, he was average in size -- but still great in bed. you'd think i'd run over his dog. after two "failed to launch" dates that followed, i lied and told him he was the biggest i'd ever had, but that i didn't want him to know because then he might go out and use it with other women. normal sex then proceeded as usual.

dudes are weird when it comes to their boinkers.

My Ex-wife was the one to tell me that he is the biggest she ever had (not that many then) and I remember I was kind of surprised but kind of proud too. Well I was young and naive ...

My current girlfriend was the first one to tell me I´m just average - and again I was surprised
She had a few more "from mini to real big ones", so she knows what she is talking about.

I always knew that I´m the "a little more than average guy" in most categories and our sexlife is good for both of us so after the first surprise it wasn´t too hard to handle the truth. I guess I´m old and wise now

well of course YOU'RE mature and wise. you're yeppie!

Tell us more about Paige.

brittanyt wrote:Tell us more about Paige.

Sure, brittnayt. What would you like to know?


Also, as an aside to everyone else, I'm constantly amazed at how certain threads go on with multiple comments, and others that don't seem very different only have one or two.

dxm2 wrote:Also, as an aside to everyone else, I'm constantly amazed at how certain threads go on with multiple comments, and others that don't seem very different only have one or two.

Yeah, I am still wondering about that fact. It seems to happen by chance, there are days with 25 new messages and days with only 2 or 3. So nothing to take too personal.

dxm2 wrote:

brittanyt wrote:Tell us more about Paige.

Sure, brittnayt. What would you like to know?

Well, nothing that would risk her anonymity or yours. The sounds are the best part but some other details would be fun as well; personality, wardrobe, appearance, style in the bed(hers and yours; though you've alluded to yours previously). The few hints that you have given, like the text message, have got my imagination going. One thing I was wondering about, was she ever riding you? If so, at what point? Maybe it all blends together for you but I am curious.

brittanyt wrote:
Well, nothing that would risk her anonymity or yours. The sounds are the best part but some other details would be fun as well; personality, wardrobe, appearance, style in the bed(hers and yours; though you've alluded to yours previously). The few hints that you have given, like the text message, have got my imagination going. One thing I was wondering about, was she ever riding you? If so, at what point? Maybe it all blends together for you but I am curious.

Oh, sure. I'm happy to do that, brittnay. I don't know that I can be so specific as to say stuff like "we were doing this position at 3:37 to 5:21," but I can give a pretty accurate overview for you.

So let me start with Paige herself. She has reddish/brownish hair curly hair just past her shoulders that she keeps loose, is tan head to toe (so probably from a machine), and has subtle freckles all over. She's in her mid-to-late 20s, stands about 5'6-ish, and although I have learned over the years to never try to guess a woman's weight (it always ends badly for me), she's pretty slender. Like all of her friends, her breasts look really big on her frame. Her roommate's I now know are large naturally, but when Paige was naked and lying on her back it was clear she has had some work done. When she's not wearing bridesmaid or cocktail dresses, she seems to mostly wear shorts and tight t-shirts.

I would describe her style in the bedroom as athletic and intensely physical; less "what new kinky thing can we try next," and more either being an energizer bunny or grinding hard. And yes, there was some of her on top. I'm a pretty multi-positional guy, so usually for me there's some mix of positions that at the very least involves me on top, gal on top, and me behind.

Here's a pretty good but general idea of what you're listening to throughout the recording. The first 20 minutes or so (pretty much all of Part 1) is standing. After we undress one another, the first five minutes are so are her facing the wall and leaning against it, and my going down on her from behind. That's followed by me entering her from behind while standing. She occasionally stopped and took me in her mouth, but not for long. The standing part of the evening ended with us fucking with her back against the wall and my holding her up by her thighs. Then we were on either the floor or the bed the rest of the way.

A lot of Part 2 is her on top. Some of that is her riding me, and some if it is my holding her hips or ass and doing all of the work from below. That's how I came the first time.

Part three is mostly me on top, though near the end I turned her over and entered her again from behind, this time with here lying down and my legs straddling her. That's how we ended things.

Does any of this help?

Totally. Thank you for sharing.

It's interesting, I'm usually on the fence about knowing what exactly is happening in a recording. Most of the time I like figuring it out and I feel like I've gotten pretty good at it based on the acoustics and bed squeaks and kissing and such. The worst though is when I can't figure out what's happening. A handjob? It sounds like a blowjob, but the bed is squeaking, is it a titfuck? Rewind and listen again. That gets so frustrating! It's rare though.

Does anyone rather know every detail or use their imagination? I do like knowing what the woman looks like. That helps. But I think I get more longevity out of a recording when I have to keep listening to try to figure out everything that happens. It's the same thing with music. I can listen to a song more if I don't know every lyric.

Oh and recordings need more titfucking. Thanks, dxm, for the two or three recordings that seem to have 'em

Wow, tweaktweak. You have quite the ear. I always thought of tit-fucking as one of those "no one's ever going to know what's happening here" audio moments.

And I'm like you, preferring to piece it together in my imagination with other people's recordings. Of course, I'm pretty sure whatever it looks like in my head is nothing like what it looks like in real life. But it still looks fun.

Ha. Thanks. To be fair the times that I know it happened was made pretty obvious by what you or she said. You even mention it once in one of your descriptions. One or two of the Jennifer ones. I think the Dona recording too. Though I heard the audio before ever reading about it so it was awesome to piece together what happened.

But yeah, I try to figure it out on my own though hate when I can't and wish there was a full blow by blow to refer to.

Anyway, Keep up the good work.

Although I, too, enjoy trying to figure out what is happening in these recordings, I really like having this description. I'm often curious, at the beginning of a long file, as to the state of dress of the individuals involved; there aren't many files where I can hear clothing being removed (something I like). This is a terrific file, by the way-- thanks.

I prefer to have an exact description of whats going on.