Page 3 of 3
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 23 Oct 2015 18:51
by physicist
I don't think this matter is worth discussing anymore over. I love JulietH's recordings and I fully support her.
This matter was a closed one since 2012. No need to pay any attention to it further.
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 23 Oct 2015 20:17
by sonidos
What are you? The discussion Police!!
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 23 Oct 2015 20:35
by thomas
physicist wrote:I don't think this matter is worth discussing anymore over. I love JulietH's recordings and I fully support her.
This matter was a closed one since 2012. No need to pay any attention to it further.
I fully agree and would highly appreciate if valuble members of the community who are making continuously authentic contributions would not be blamed again for things that are already resolved and clarified. Thank you!
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 23 Oct 2015 21:33
by audiophile444
Thomas and physicist, as you know I was the first one to jump all over sonidos for his expressing doubts about the JulietH files based on his gut feelings. I also share your support for JulietH. That said, sonidos has a point. Free speech is free speech. Just because a previous suspicion was settled in 2012 does not mean the topic should not be raised again if in the intervening years suspicions arise again concerning new material. If sonidos' instincts tell him something is fishy about the recordings we should hear him out, if he can elaborate. We all have instincts based on past experiences and what we have heard or read. If sonidos is willing to share the basis for his instincts he should not be cut off from sharing them with us. If not, then it would be best in my opinion to let this topic ride. My best to you both Thomas and physicist. I enjoy accessing your posts. I always look forward to them. Audiophile
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 24 Oct 2015 02:22
by physicist
That is the thing, its this matter I was referring to specifically. If there is another topic that maybe deemed to be fabricated then the accuser should post their relevant concerns there, not revive a dead topic.
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 24 Oct 2015 05:30
by audiophile444
I agree. No quarrel from me. Regards, physicist. Audiophile
Re: family cum to stay
Posted: 25 Oct 2015 08:54
by doron
its been like that for years. he/she stated before that if the posts are not appreciated, they will stop. the account is then not active for a few weeks and then he/she starts again hoping for new suckers. it will be best to just ignore and not comment.