Karl_rules wrote: 05 Oct 2025 11:41
Dear Marea, I received your message but I can't reply to it (for reasons unknown to me), so I'm replying here.
I think it's completely stupid that we're allowed to receive private messages but not send them. If we've established contact with someone, how are we supposed to reply to them?
Hello, and thank you for your message. I didn't even know you could send private messages on this site.
Everything I said, I sincerely believe, and I myself have this obsession and love for voyeurism, for the same reasons you mentioned in your message.
Yes, I firmly believe that our orgasms and our “primitive” sounds are hereditary and connect us directly to animals and our animal instincts.
The neighbor downstairs is a woman with a very deep voice, yet when she climaxes, her deep voice disappears as if it had never been hers, and she begins to moan like an 18-year-old girl with high-pitched cries that she cannot control. I find this terribly exciting, and it is also this discovery and these revelations about people's true identities that drive me to voyeurism and, above all, to listen to the sounds of copulation.
For the same reasons as you, I prefer couples aged 40 to 60, and often more discreet and gentler sexual relations, more romantic and less violent and pornographic. I hate it when people scream as if it hurts or is too violent.
It's really fascinating and wonderful that you were able to leave out all the conversations before the sex, and it's actually very important, if not the most important thing, because it allows us to hear the “natural” or rather “civilized” voices before intercourse begins. It also allows us to understand that despite everyone's accents and foreign languages, when moments of pleasure, animalistic moments arrive, then voices become the same for everyone.
The universal language.
First of all, I want to thank you for your response.
Since the comment was a "private conversation" about a shared, personal issue or idea, I thought (with good intentions) to send you a private message to clarify my approach, which, as you may have noticed, is quite consistent with yours, and to expand on it based on my understanding of your comment. I also thought that by receiving a personal, private message, you would have the option of responding through that same channel. In any case, I think it's clear, and I appreciate your explanation, which seems sensible and consistent with my own thinking.
I understand that many people edit audio so that "voices" can't be heard. I don't do it as long as what's said doesn't affect people's privacy. And I don't do it because I sincerely believe that with those "voices," with certain "conversations" (I insist, that don't affect privacy), the audio gains a lot, and we don't just place it in moans, bed creaks, and "sounding notes" that, ultimately, contribute nothing and are even repetitive and therefore tiresome to listen to.
I hope I've made myself clear in what I'm trying to say, because I don't think my English is academic at all, and I may not fully understand what I'm trying to say.
Whether privately or publicly, it's a pleasure communicating with you, and even more so to share common ideas.
