Community of Sexsoundlovers

A distant relative who has stayed with us before, am beginning to think we are not the point of interest, the chap is not the husband - get my drift.

Very nice recording. Sounds like she enjoyed herself!

Yeah.... not sure what he was doing to her but she sure was enjoying it. (giggle,giggle).

tbluraider wrote:Very nice recording. Sounds like she enjoyed herself!

Not herself. Him.
(Sergio)

Juliet, are you in this cap?

sonar wrote:Juliet, are you in this cap?

Yeah. You have these captures in the craziest scenarios and situations but when you are going to post something from a session between you and your boyfriend/husband?? Maybe have one of your roommates or girlfriends record it for you.

well I've been asked quite a few times for a recording of me and my boyfriend, I've asked him to record us when I dont know its happening so some time ..........

thats off a homemade porn clip

Bazzy wrote:thats off a homemade porn clip

Wait a minute. Are you saying you don't believe JulietH is just a "girl" who "works at a hotel" (that all of a sudden now has honeymoons suites) for the sole reason of recording patrons having sex and constantly has all sorts opportunities arise to capture "her" mom, aunt, roomies, etc having sex but somehow hasn't managed to capture "her" own session with "her" boyfriend? How dare you! You should be ashamed! Please also overlook that "she" was called out for plagiarized audio which never addressed.

billgreg wrote:

sonar wrote:Juliet, are you in this cap?

Yeah. You have these captures in the craziest scenarios and situations but when you are going to post something from a session between you and your boyfriend/husband?? Maybe have one of your roommates or girlfriends record it for you.

Guys, don't care and stay cool. Just ignore and don't download the files in order to save some time Some things are simply so obvious.

Lumby75 wrote:Guys, don't care and stay cool. Just ignore and don't download the files in order to save some time Some things are simply so obvious.

Well advised and point taken.

My whole point was that JulietH's claims are dubious at best and posts material that has been suspect in terms of originality. The only time I've ever seen anyone on a message board oversell their identity (how many times have we been told "she" works at a hotel - okay, we got it the first 100 times) is someone trollish in nature. You know what, that's fine if JulietH wants to pretend she's a girl who only works at a hotel, big deal. We're all hiding behind anonymous screen names on a message board. But my bull meter is pegged to the max with all the contrived nonsense. The problem becomes that the thinly veiled facade only weakens the legitimacy of this site with recordings that are questionable in origin. Maybe if "she" came out the first time "she" was called out for lifted material with some sort of explanation then perhaps I wouldn't be so suspicious. But it was ignored and "she" kept posting as if nothing happened. I mean, come on, we're all anonymous but at least be straight up with everyone. Otherwise, it only cheapens the atmosphere and I haven't found a site that matches the caliber here. That's why I finally felt compelled to speak out.

I will cease all comments regarding this from here on out. My apologies to the administrators of this site.

billgreg wrote:I will cease all comments regarding this from here on out. My apologies to the administrators of this site.

Hey billgreg, no need to apologize. This is a site that supports free speech and criticism. We as administrators only ask for politeness and I don´t see that you broke that rule.

Otherwise, it only cheapens the atmosphere and I haven't found a site that matches the caliber here.

Thanks for that! I think the site can cope with some sounds of possibly doubtful origin although I´d prefer JulietH to at least answer these questions.

Yeppie.......I barely ever post but in this case I'll have to agree with billgreg. I was under the impression that there was more than "possibly doubtful origin" involved. I thought that JulietH had been proven to have posted recordings stolen from other sites on the net.
None of us likes to be taken as a fool and JulietH seems to be making fools of us. If the recordings are, indeed, stolen, then that constitutes grounds for banning, in my humble opinion.

Barry

Barry, from the number of thanks JulietH´s posts receive, I am under the impression that quite a number of members enjoy these recordings, others are somewhat bugged because they feel to be fooled. The pro-JulietH members seem to be the majority and acting as an admin I have to take this into consideration.