Community of Sexsoundlovers

I’m posting the file in this section with the full agreement of Yeppie. If you want more detail of the background, visit this thread;

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4709

The sound is from an absolutely genuine voyeur video capture and is nothing to do with me. This was shot at night using infra-red and it’s obvious that the guys filming don’t have much regard for the sound, so don’t expect too much. There are sections where the recording was paused/interrupted and here I have inserted brief silent bits to indicate where recording stopped and then resumed.

The couple are in a field, among trees. From the brief glimpse I got of his face I would say a good looking fit guy and guess late 20s. I only saw her from the back as they walked away at a distance, but would describe her as a slim dark haired female. I can say that she had very nice legs, even though they were partly obscured by his arse for most of the time

Although they were in one another’s arms at the end of the sex session, they were only close and not holding hands for the shot of them walking away. They were both dressed casually and didn’t look like it was for a night on the town. I’m only guessing here, but could they have both been married, but maybe not to one another? Please don’t ask for more visual stuff, as I agreed with Yeppie I would not give any.

I have included a file with the sound pretty much as the original and one with some noise reduction. This is not the best example from the videos and if you guys think it might be worth it, I will post some more.

Yes!!

Thank you for posting these!! Outdoor section here is one of the best but a bit dry most of the time because the captures and USB extractions are 10X more difficult than same effort with hotel recordings.

Thoughts.. Nice efforts on the NR file but to me the result is too artificial and canned. 'Original' file is noisier but to me just adds to the atmosphere.

That said, on 'Original' where you cut the photographers' comments I like the brief blank spaces you provide. I have always tried to delete these pauses but your inclusion of them to me gives a nice pace to the event, and also draws the imagination more. I'm thinking of changing to try same for upcoming recordings...

gekko1 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2017 15:09 Yes!!

Thank you for posting these!! Outdoor section here is one of the best but a bit dry most of the time because the captures and USB extractions are 10X more difficult than same effort with hotel recordings.

Thoughts.. Nice efforts on the NR file but to me the result is too artificial and canned. 'Original' file is noisier but to me just adds to the atmosphere.

That said, on 'Original' where you cut the photographers' comments I like the brief blank spaces you provide. I have always tried to delete these pauses but your inclusion of them to me gives a nice pace to the event, and also draws the imagination more. I'm thinking of changing to try same for upcoming recordings...

Thanks for the comments and I will post more, some of which are a lot longer and better in my opinion.

It does take a bit of time though. All of the stuff has ambient sound, but for most of it, there are no sex sounds, so looking through and finding any bits takes quite a while. You can tell the guys who are recording don't understand or care that sounds add so much, because at times they even talk over them (crazy). I also wonder if couples outside try to be quieter in general, trying not to draw attention to themselves.

Thanks for the comments about the blank spaces and I look forward to listening to some of your excellent posts with them if you think they help. Just to clarify, for anyone who didn't read the first description, they are put in where the recording was paused or interrupted, or bits were edited out of the original for whatever reason. Hope that makes sense.

Makes perfect sense. The stuff I edit is when the Elevator opens or a door in the same hallway forcing me to split for a couple of minutes. Even though I'm pretty good with the Pause/Resume function, there is still some invasive noise. So after eliminating the noise I try to delete the gap to make everything seamless. But after hearing your edit, a 1 second quiet gap seems to lend some interest. I kind of like it.

Excellent, excellent!

I can only imagine how hard this must have been to record. There's a "Lovers Lane" area in my local village that attracts many local young couples but despite my efforts all I've managed to record so far is a few rustles and indistinct moans, which could be anything in all truth. But these are the real deal so I offer my congratulations on getting these excellent outdoor captures.

LeStanf wrote: ↑26 Oct 2017 01:49 Excellent, excellent!

I can only imagine how hard this must have been to record. There's a "Lovers Lane" area in my local village that attracts many local young couples but despite my efforts all I've managed to record so far is a few rustles and indistinct moans, which could be anything in all truth. But these are the real deal so I offer my congratulations on getting these excellent outdoor captures.

Thanks for the comments, but just to clarify, I didn't capture this. Wish I had, but it's from a genuine voyeur video series that a number of members had been talking about in another thread. Some members asked what the sound was like, so I offered to post some and Yeppie agreed. He also suggested this section for posting. There's a link at the top of the page if you want to have a look at the thread in question with more details about where they are from.

Some are lots better than this in my opinion and I will post more.

Good one. Shame outdoor clips are so rare.

gekko1 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2017 16:48 Makes perfect sense. The stuff I edit is when the Elevator opens or a door in the same hallway forcing me to split for a couple of minutes. Even though I'm pretty good with the Pause/Resume function, there is still some invasive noise. So after eliminating the noise I try to delete the gap to make everything seamless. But after hearing your edit, a 1 second quiet gap seems to lend some interest. I kind of like it.

I'm thinking a short gap would work better - if you've had to remove a short section due to interruption of some sort, leaving an audible marker (that gap) leaves the listener to imagine how much time has passed (even if it's just a few seconds), whereas gapless sort of implies it's a continuous recording. I'd go for a short ramp-down and ramp-up either side of the gap. Then again, I'm just a listener, not a contributor, so I'm hardly in a position to suggest anything that makes for extra effort on your part!

[quote= leaving an audible marker (that gap) leaves the listener to imagine how much time has passed (even if it's just a few seconds), whereas gapless sort of implies it's a continuous recording.
[/quote]

With the video it's being extracted from it's impossible to know how long the gap was. It's just obvious from the visual edit point. Glad you liked the idea.