Caretaker Masturbation

[triblover3]

I'm in a wheelchair. I now have mostly male caregivers because thing like this happen a lot:



I had one of a caretaker who had a crush on me 5 years ago

We decided that intercourse or oral would cross professional boundaries, hand jobs were okay, but I wanted to hear her coming.

I set up a microphone in my bedroom and drove my wheelchair into the living-room and let her do her thing.

Turned out she masturbated to orgasm in my bed.

The way she opened and closed the recording was very sweet.

I'd love to share it and get feedback from the group.

Sorry that the audio is only in one ear. Try to imagine laying next to her on the bed masturbating together with her head breathing into your left ear

[reggind]

Thank you for your post and for the back round story. I am looking forward to listening to it!!

[reggind]

Sorry dude, but this sounds totally fake.

[triblover3]

I most respectfully disagree.

Why would I bother to detail the backstory and post the file at all, and ask for feedback if it were staged somehow?

Perhaps there is some cognitive bias regarding sexuality of persons with disabilities going on.

Who else thinks it's fake?

[sexyreadhead]

fwiw, i don't think it's fake.

but if you look around this site, there are always a bunch of folks who think this,that or the other post sounds more/less real/fake; most of it, as best i can tell, has to do with a dude or dudette's personal experience and/or preference.

that being said, i'm not sure the wisdom of trying to get the community to brand reggind some kind of anti-disabled-persons bigot until he actually says something that has anything at all to do with disabled persons.

shake it off, don't worry abut the haters, and keep posting -- i'll certainly be there to listen quite happily.

that's my advice, anywho.

[yeppie]

Well-chosen words of a wise woman I´d say!

Perhaps there is some cognitive bias regarding sexuality of persons with disabilities going on.

As far as I came to know reggind, I´m pretty sure it´s not.

[reggind]

You can be pretty sure if you get a bias from me that it will not start with sorry dude...

Your file sounds fake to me. I am sorry that is does, but it does. You were the one who asked for feedback. I think if you listen to your file with open ears you will walk away thinking your file sounds like something from a 1980's ear sex line. I have heard a lot of sex sounds in my life and the only sex I have heard that sounds like that is fake.

BTW, I did not call you any names nor bring any hate into the situation, I fact if anything I said sorry because I wanted to be polite when I provided the feedback you asked for. If you only want feedback from sycophants please be sure and specify that in advance next time.

On the plus side, when I say I really did enjoy a file to someone, they can rest assured that the file was truly enjoyed and I am not just saying so because it is fashionable.

[sc0tt-uk]

Why would I bother to detail the backstory and post the file at all, and ask for feedback if it were staged somehow?

The same reasons that anybody else does. They enjoy the props and access to the archives. It's not that much of a stretch to imagine that applying seeing as you've already asked for access to the archives in another thread. I'm not saying this pointing an accusatory finger btw. If you're one of the old-timers (I also noticed you asking about previous posts from the late 90's) then it's awesome that you've found us again, and maybe you hadn't found the read it first forum yet. I'm sure there's no harm done anyway. Just chiming in with the voice of experience on one of the weird ways things work round these parts

Who else thinks it's fake?

Hmmm, depends on the context of the word fake. If you mean do I think it's fake as in the backstory has been matched to a random file, then nope, probably not. If you mean fake as in does it sound like she's faking it a bit to me, then very possibly. As it's not a covert recording and she's intending to put on a show, does that even matter? Tbh, what I'm interested in more than anyone's knee-jerk reaction as to whether she's really got her hands down her pants or whether she's actually sitting there painting her nails is whether the intent is true in as much as this was recorded and intended for one person. If it was, then massive respect to you man... that's awesome!

Perhaps there is some cognitive bias regarding sexuality of persons with disabilities going on.

For the record, my aforementioned awesome would be the same sized slice of awesome if you weren't in a wheelchair. No more, no less.

[ChocolateRideHer]

REAL of FAKE?

First of all, I find the background information very interesting as I have just read a book written by a sex surrogate recounting her
experiences. Do you really (did you) get a lot of offers for sex from female caregivers?

The recording. As I work in linguistics we listen to and analyse sounds and recorded conversations so...

--At the beginning of the recording we hear a female voice.
--Then we hear a sliding door (being closed I presume)
--The female voice speaks and then we can hear her speaking
again at a distance from the mic--this means she has moved from where
the recorder is to the bed.
--00:28-00:39 we can clearly hear her get on the bed (perfectly audible sounds of bed
creaking as someone gets on it)
03:16 we can also hear creaking (movement) on the bed.

Now let's discuss her sounds. I am in my hotel every weekend getting 10 captures per night,
so I doknow what actual sex sounds like. Compare the woman on the recording with what
you here in stupid AmericanPie type moves or even in porn (ie it is important for me
to distinguish between sex on the other side of the hotel door or whether the person has
the porno film on TV).

This woman sounds nothing like what we hear in films.

I would have to say this is very real. Whether or not she was actuall maasturbating is another question.
We do not hear any squishy wet sounds but why is that the fault of triblover? A female went into a room
and got on a bed and made sounds.

Based on allof the above: I would judge this recording to be REAL.

[futtock]

I'm with chocolaterideher on this. The recording sounds perfectly genuine to me - as in there is nothing to indicate that this is taken from a porno. The questions for me are:

was she actually masturbating?
to what extent were the moans 'put on' or exaggerated just to please triblover3?

These are two things only the lady in question can really say for certain so does it really matter? To me the answer is 'no'. I don't find the recording particularly hot but that's only my own preference. Plenty of people might disagree and that's perfectly fine.

In short the number of lurkers outnumbers the number of active contributers by a long way so if you like a recording by all means say so. we all like a bit of encouragement and getting these sounds is often not easy. If you don't like the recording there isn't much to be gained by putting off contributers because you never know, there next contribution could be the hottest thing you've ever heard so do what I do and just move on. Unless someone has obviously ripped the sound from a porno then they deserve eberything they get. That clearly isn't the case here.

[Audio]

I believe that the background story is true. Why? Just because nobody would invent a story with a disabled wheelchair man. That would not make sense in the context of an erotic forum. People are usually grossed out by disabled persons. Personally, I am sure the guy is real and his story true BUT the women sounds as if she has stagged an exaggaerated her masturbation. there are no wet, squashy sounds and you can hear her moan immediatley after she went to bed. Obvioulsy, she has not really masturbated but put on a show. To make it short, the story is real but the sound fake.

[sc0tt-uk]

nobody would invent a story with a disabled wheelchair man. That would not make sense in the context of an erotic forum. People are usually grossed out by disabled persons.

And the award for most closed-minded post of 2014 goes to...

*slow clap*

[Audio]

No, you get me wrong, it was not meant to offend anybody, I just wanted to explain why I thought the story was real. Actually, I would like to hear him have sex with his caretaker because i am intrigued by unorthodox sex constellations.

[dtron]

Hm, this is shaping up to be a good thread.
IMO this sounds like she is faking it but it would still turn me on if I knew her so all in all this is a very nice gesture from her!
Sorry to hear btw that you actually need a caretaker but you seem to be doing fine!

[dxm2]

Interesting thread, and I guess I'll go ahead and weigh in.

For me, "Is it Real or Fake?" seems the wrong question.

Case in point: I for one almost always change one single detail about any person I post, in order to give that person some cover in real life. Sometimes it's their job, sometimes it's their hair color, sometimes it's the city where they live. It's always a tiny thing and it never really changes the spirit of the actual event, but it's hopefully enough so that in the unlikely chance someone who knows one of them stops by they would not say, "Hey, that person he's describing is a short, slender, blond, 32 year old airline pilot from Phoenix -- my friend Betty is a short, slender, blond, 32 year old airline pilot from Phoenix ... HEY! Her voice actually sounds just like Betty! OH MY GOD! IT'S BETTY!"

Does that make them less "real?" By the strictest definition, yes. After all, maybe you have always had a secret fantasy about hooking up with a woman who, say, sells cars for a living, and by odd coincidence I just made that gal I met who really works at the cosmetics counter a car salesman in my post -- and so you are getting a thrill that is unearned on my part. (OTOH, I suppose that if you have a thing about gals who work at cosmetic counters than I am depriving you of that vicarious thrill.)

In addition to that, there's this additional question with some of the posts here: You are with someone who knows that they are being recorded, and they know that you will "use it" to remember the experience later. Because of this, they don't just phone it in. They fuck a little harder, a little louder, and for a little longer than they might have otherwise. Not necessarily more than they ever do, but maybe more than they do on an average night -- partially because being recorded (or video taped) excites them, and partially because they feel like in that situation they really need to bring their 'A 'game for posterity. Are they being any less real for bringing their "A" game rather than their "B" game on that (or any) particular night? I'd argue no, but I know many here would disagree.

Or, if you prefer, there's this question: In a lot of the recordings I listen to where one or both people don't know they are being recorded, it's obvious that one partner isn't that into what's happening throughout most of the session. (Not that they aren't enjoying it, necessarily -- just that they aren't that into it.) Then when that person (usually the woman) senses their partner is close, they suddenly become loud and encouraging so that their partner will finally come, so they can finally go to sleep or get on with their evening or whatever. Does that make what you hear in those recordings more real, or more fake? Or neither?

The better question than "real of Fake," I think, is this one:

Does any of the above make the recordings here less valuable to listen to?

The answer to that probably depends on who you are, and so your mileage may vary. For me, obviously, it doesn't.

Ultimately a recording should be judged on its own merits, I think. The best story in the world can't make a dull recording exciting; a great recording doesn't make a dull story hot. Whatever the Absolute Truth behind triblover3's recording is, it's silly to think we'll ever really know.

So just ask yourself, do you like the recording?