June at 19

[thomas]

Any chance to get an explanation what happened here?

[physicist]

Any chance to get an explanation what happened here?

Not sure honestly.

lol at the naughty america banner.

Why upload fakes though?

One original upload better than 50 fakes

[thomas]

that`s true, and it would be quite dissapointing to anticipate that other dxm2 recordings are somehow fabricated as well...

[audiophile444]

Shouldn't we give DXM2 the benefit of the doubt and wait until he provides an explanation before reaching any conclusions about the apparent or alleged discrepancies that have been noted? Perhaps, he records a lot of porn clips and just mixed up some of those with his own clips, for example. Also, although I do not have access to the audio archives I vaguely recall form reading the textual material that someone mentioned DXM2 submitted clips to other sites before and perhaps after he started submitting contributions to this site. Maybe some recycling? That happens frequently on audio and regular porn sites. I have heard several recycles for example on sites that have audio clips submitted by amateurs to a variety of sites, with both visual and audio material. In any event, this has become a seemingly contentious situation and one of the site's best contributors should be allowed to speak out, to clarify the situation as I for one am a big fan and look forward to his future contributions. I hope I am not ruffling any feathers and I do want to say also that it is fair for people to question the authenticity of a clip if they have good grounds to do so. I am not calling into question their judgment; I am just requesting the obvious: let us hear what DXM2 has to say.

[thomas]

I am just requesting the obvious: let us hear what DXM2 has to say.

Sure... the chance for this exists since mid of August already...

[physicist]

True thomas

With regards to fabrication, won't be the first time tbh

[audiophile444]

Thomas is right: two months is a long time. Physicist, would you please give some specific examples of fabrication? It is really so easy for someone technically savvy - I am technically inept - to transfer audio from various sources and claim the audio as one's own and even lend credence to the clips by adding textual material but for the life of me I cannot fathom what would drive someone to do it. It seems totally pointless. An ego builder? Delight in perpetrating a hoax? You old timers on this site such as Thomas and Physicist seem able to spot possible fabrications on the basis of the sound characteristics and quality. Is that correct? By the way, I for one have been grateful for your own contributions to this site. I'm a rank amateur in all aspects of sound recordings but have enough personal experience to make a stab at guessing whether the actual sex recorded is genuine or not, even though as I have previously commented women react so differently to their partner's performances. And some react hardly at all! Anyway, this is a highly intriguing and interesting discussion. I do hope DXM2 weighs in soon. Otherwise, suspicions will be enhanced.

[physicist]

The longer one takes to respond the more a suspicision turns to belief

Search around the site. I remember a few from the top of my head. Basically its when someone claims the recording is their own when the source is different.

[audiophile444]

OK, Physicist. I understand. I was not sure if you were referring specifically to DXM2 or making a general comment. Thanks.

[Quadrophenia1]

Site rules prevent a lot of posts that I KNOW a lot of us would like to hear. (Everyone knows exactly what I'm talking about). Every one of DMX's friends knows they are being captured. Even though they're not secret recordings, they're usually fun.

[d2009sd2009s]

Since the discussion came to life, I'll add my 2 cent here. Actually, I was in some way personal fan of dxm2, so I was very much confused with this file and following escape dxm2 from the forum (Last active: 15 Aug 2015 17:29 - information from his profile, I think we have no chances to get explanations from him now). But I still do not believe all his recordings were fabricated, moreover, I think that most of them were original, because his voice was clearly recognizable, the content was in good correspondence with the description etc. And, btw, practically every his post had some amount of admired comments, and I do not remember any doubts about originality were stated before this one. So all this story sounds pretty strange and mysterious for me. Usually the motivation to fool the community is to get access to archives, but dxm2 already had it for some (not small) time, so why to post such a file? Just to troll us? Then why escape after it?
Btw, from previous discussions, I remember some members (sexyreadhead, e.g., if I am right) said that they know dxm2 personally. May be we can get some information from them?

[h3dge]

Truthfully, dxm2 were some of my fave Recordings and i wish he would come back.

[yeppie]

Truthfully, dxm2 were some of my fave Recordings and i wish he would come back.

Me too and I wish he´d come back with an answer.

[audiophile444]

I think d2009sd2009' s idea to contact one of the people who knows him is a very good one. I may be wrong but didn't Sexyreadhead and dxm2 have a recorded session together? She has not posted recently but maybe those who have commented in the past on her posts might contact her. It really would be a shame if dxm2 backed out. I especially enjoyed reading his background pieces.

[physicist]

I think d2009sd2009' s idea to contact one of the people who knows him is a very good one. I may be wrong but didn't Sexyreadhead and dxm2 have a recorded session together? She has not posted recently but maybe those who have commented in the past on her posts might contact her. It really would be a shame if dxm2 backed out. I especially enjoyed reading his background pieces.

I think sexyredhead was a fan, they did not record anything together per se.

I don't knot, gut feeling says if there is nothing to hide from why hide in the first place?