Do not disturb or catching the whole family

[Quadrophenia1]

My feeling is if these were truly clandestine captures from next door or down the hall we would have no clue what the age of the couple having a good time together were.

[akka3000]

Shouldn't have given a description. Then it would have been oke

[yeppie]

To be honest, i find it quite disturbing that you audio taped an underaged girl. You should delete the recordings with the girl of 16 in it.

PS : I have of course nothing against your work, the parents one is great.

16 is the legal age of consent is most civilised countries. This includes spain. In germany it is 14 actually.

Lets not pretend to be offended by mere ill conceived predujices

Ps please support your views with facts yeah?

It does not matter that you are allowed to having sex being 16 or 14 or whatever. This is about spreading youth porn.

The facts are easy to find:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__184c.html
(German Law concerning youth porn for the age from 14 to 17)
In short: up to 3 years in jail for dissemination, purchasing or posession

[Jeremy]

To be honest, i find it quite disturbing that you audio taped an underaged girl. You should delete the recordings with the girl of 16 in it.

PS : I have of course nothing against your work, the parents one is great.

16 is the legal age of consent is most civilised countries. This includes spain. In germany it is 14 actually.

Lets not pretend to be offended by mere ill conceived predujices

Ps please support your views with facts yeah?

In the majority of adult websites (PH for instance) the age limit for an apparence in videos is always limited to 18 whatever if you re from germany, uk, china, america etc...

Respectfully this is not a video porn site so i disagree with the comparison.

Id also add that the actual age is purely speculative on the part of the recorder.

To be clear i agree with the spirit of your original sentiments but i do not believe they are relevant in this case.

[sonidos]

I have to totally agree with Jeremy. The other thing to note is that, as well as being of legal age to have sex, the girl is on holiday with a 19 year old and sharing a room...presumably her parents are cool with this. As Jeremy noted, all comparisons with video porn are silly, were this a porn movie I'd agree it would be morally wrong..but to record her moans through a for in a public space I'd suggest is fine

[PiledriverWalz]

I have to totally agree with Jeremy. The other thing to note is that, as well as being of legal age to have sex, the girl is on holiday with a 19 year old and sharing a room...presumably her parents are cool with this. As Jeremy noted, all comparisons with video porn are silly, were this a porn movie I'd agree it would be morally wrong..but to record her moans through a for in a public space I'd suggest is fine

This is so wrong ... You're just justifying that sexulizing a minor is normal. Moans are sexual, this is terribly wrong.
Go even on a foot fetish website. Feet pictures are not naked pics and it is less sexual than moans (ppl wear sandals and don't have the obligation to hide their feet, it's not as intimate as moans) but even there, you're not allowed to post u n d e r a g e d feet pics

[spirou]

To be honest, i find it quite disturbing that you audio taped an underaged girl. You should delete the recordings with the girl of 16 in it.

PS : I have of course nothing against your work, the parents one is great.

16 is the legal age of consent is most civilised countries. This includes spain. In germany it is 14 actually.

Lets not pretend to be offended by mere ill conceived predujices

Ps please support your views with facts yeah?

In the majority of adult websites (PH for instance) the age limit for an apparence in videos is always limited to 18 whatever if you re from germany, uk, china, america etc...

Absolutely concur!!

[horny87]

Fucking shit im too late ... but im sure he will catch them in 2years or something again in similiar hotel or so to upload when shes just young and maybe without parents in a new post and all ok then

[AudioLover]

I have to totally agree with Jeremy. The other thing to note is that, as well as being of legal age to have sex, the girl is on holiday with a 19 year old and sharing a room...presumably her parents are cool with this. As Jeremy noted, all comparisons with video porn are silly, were this a porn movie I'd agree it would be morally wrong..but to record her moans through a for in a public space I'd suggest is fine

This is so wrong ... You're just justifying that sexulizing a minor is normal. Moans are sexual, this is terribly wrong.
Go even on a foot fetish website. Feet pictures are not naked pics and it is less sexual than moans (ppl wear sandals and don't have the obligation to hide their feet, it's not as intimate as moans) but even there, you're not allowed to post u n d e r a g e d feet pics

Kid. You are wrong. This isnt a porn site (obviously) and shouldnt be held to the same standard. More importantly, assuming the age was judged correctly; we cant be certain; there is nothing underage or illegal aboit having sex at 16. There is nothing more sexual about a foot than my ear lobe. Nor is anyone sexualising anything (whatever that means). Stop being so gen z over this. Go browse tatler and fawn over the fur coats or summat. Jeeez ppl like you!

Looks like you didn't read the section yeppy posted. If you did so, you should know that porn isn't restricted to a certain type of media. Plus, assuming that it is correct that the thread starter got to know the girl's age during a conversation, he was fully aware of what he was doing while recording.

[yeppie]

I thought ethics on youthporn containing underage persons would not be open for discussion in this community but I had to learn that it is. The laws are not and they are clear, despite all fake arguments we had to read. So this topic is now closed.
I hope we all can return to "normal" and resist proceeding with personal attacks. This extends to personal messages.