Hi All,
This is a catch I made a few nights' ago during a business trip in Belfast. In view of the high quality submissions from others of late, I pondered whether it was worth posting this or not. There are certainly some nice moans but the background noise from the TV is just soooo distracting that this recording pales in comparison to my fellow aficionados with whom I share this wonderful site.
But then I thought what the hell, it is a sex sound after all!
Very nice looking couple, both reasonably slim and in their mid thirties, I would estimate. I saw them across the room at dinner and there was no real sign of deep passion between them so I'd say they've been together for a while. I caught their room number when they signed for the meal so later in the evening I left a recorder by their door and this is what I caught.
Now, personally I never (never, ever, ever, ever!!!) "engage" while the TV is on in the background. I'm okay with music, in fact this is part of my preferred environment (along with a good quality white wine) but TV is just too distracting for my taste. However, over the last couple of years I've captured several recordings of couples who do just that. So I wondered..... am I alone in my hatred of the mixing of sliding-and-tongues with the dreaded gogglebox?
So even if you choose not to download the attachment, please let me know whether you agree with me. Is TV acceptable, or am I a weirdo as well as a perv?
x x x
L.
TV or not TV, that is the question.
-
- Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 28 Jan 2015 19:06
-
- Knight
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: 08 Jan 2015 01:49
- x 326
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
LeStanf wrote:Hi All,
This is a catch I made a few nights' ago during a business trip in Belfast. In view of the high quality submissions from others of late, I pondered whether it was worth posting this or not. There are certainly some nice moans but the background noise from the TV is just soooo distracting that this recording pales in comparison to my fellow aficionados with whom I share this wonderful site.
But then I thought what the hell, it is a sex sound after all!
Very nice looking couple, both reasonably slim and in their mid thirties, I would estimate. I saw them across the room at dinner and there was no real sign of deep passion between them so I'd say they've been together for a while. I caught their room number when they signed for the meal so later in the evening I left a recorder by their door and this is what I caught.
Now, personally I never (never, ever, ever, ever!!!) "engage" while the TV is on in the background. I'm okay with music, in fact this is part of my preferred environment (along with a good quality white wine) but TV is just too distracting for my taste. However, over the last couple of years I've captured several recordings of couples who do just that. So I wondered..... am I alone in my hatred of the mixing of sliding-and-tongues with the dreaded gogglebox?
So even if you choose not to download the attachment, please let me know whether you agree with me. Is TV acceptable, or am I a weirdo as well as a perv?
x x x
L.
You are absolutely right, TV is a nogo when having sex... having said that I remember a couple in the former student dorm very well that used the advertisement breaks for having sex, and continued to watch TV afterwards...
Nevertheless, many thanks for sharing, I like your recording...
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 15 Dec 2014 23:13
- x 5
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
I personally, yeah, not while the TV is on.
However, I have had personal experience with couples who do it while a movie is playing, if for no other reason than to try and mask their sounds so people wouldn't hear/know what was going on. In a dorm or shared living space I guess it makes some sense. But alone? in a hotel? I dunno, not my cup of tea I guess.
However, I have had personal experience with couples who do it while a movie is playing, if for no other reason than to try and mask their sounds so people wouldn't hear/know what was going on. In a dorm or shared living space I guess it makes some sense. But alone? in a hotel? I dunno, not my cup of tea I guess.
-
- Kingpin
- Posts: 940
- Joined: 09 May 2014 10:05
- x 334
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
As for me, the TV is annoying (even not during sex, to be honest), so my vote also for TV off. Thanks for the recording anyway, the girl sounds very nice. It's a pity that they have such a habit to make the TV on, the recording could be much better without it.
They were extremely quickthomas wrote: having said that I remember a couple in the former student dorm very well that used the advertisement breaks for having sex, and continued to watch TV afterwards...
-
- Knight
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: 20 Dec 2005 12:43
- x 28
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
Annoying that it masks some detail for sure, but tbh I like a more challenging recording to pop up here once in a while.
To answer your question, if there was actually anything worth watching on the gogglebox nowadays then I suppose it could happen here, but there isn't, so it doesn't. The girl I've posted here under the initials UF often used to make a point of turning the tv on even if we had the place to ourselves and she had no intention of watching it, so I guess some people are more comfortable with a constant background sound. A more recent experience I had was the one and only time I've ever heard Rachel go solo with the tv in her bedroom still on, and believe it or not she took a quick break to turn the tv down rather than off entirely, then up came the volume again once she was done. What the heck is the thought process behind that!
It's all subjective, but in conclusion, I wouldn't classify you as a weirdo... just a perv
To answer your question, if there was actually anything worth watching on the gogglebox nowadays then I suppose it could happen here, but there isn't, so it doesn't. The girl I've posted here under the initials UF often used to make a point of turning the tv on even if we had the place to ourselves and she had no intention of watching it, so I guess some people are more comfortable with a constant background sound. A more recent experience I had was the one and only time I've ever heard Rachel go solo with the tv in her bedroom still on, and believe it or not she took a quick break to turn the tv down rather than off entirely, then up came the volume again once she was done. What the heck is the thought process behind that!
It's all subjective, but in conclusion, I wouldn't classify you as a weirdo... just a perv
-
- Knight
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: 23 Feb 2014 06:14
- x 347
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
I don't like the TV, and I don't like music, but I am a bit odd. I too have had woman who will snap the TV or radio on. I think they are shy. I am not sure if they are shy about being overheard by others or just shy about their own noises in general.
-
- Kingpin
- Posts: 269
- Joined: 26 Apr 2012 22:44
- x 4
Re: TV or not TV, that is the question.
First let me thank for the post. I like the clip.
My preference is without TV - but a running TV doesn't harm the clip as long as it's not too loud.
I think plenty of couples in hotels use TV by purpose to mask their noises. But maybe I'm wrong ..
In this particular clip I think it's too loud.
** I once had a couple in thr hotel room next door with the pay-tv porn on and they were doing it in paralell. Hard to tell which is which ...**
My preference is without TV - but a running TV doesn't harm the clip as long as it's not too loud.
I think plenty of couples in hotels use TV by purpose to mask their noises. But maybe I'm wrong ..
In this particular clip I think it's too loud.
** I once had a couple in thr hotel room next door with the pay-tv porn on and they were doing it in paralell. Hard to tell which is which ...**