Hi all,
got my first recording, and I think it quiet nice. I made it in a Etap Hotel
near Bremen/ Germany. The sound isolation of the walls was excellent - the room`s door wasn`t, haha! You have to regard that the rooms of this hotel got a second door to separate the sleeping room frome a smaller room next to the room`s entrance door. This door was closed. The AC was constantly turned on and quiet noisy. Around one o`clock I heard a loud monaning when I came back from the hotel lobby with my bottle of water and was entering my room.
The loud moaning I heared about once a minute in different time intervalls
accompanied by a loud female loughing. I could not locate where it came
from. None of my direct neihbours was resonsible. So I waited a few minutes in my room`s entrance in hope to locate the girl in joy. After a while she got louder and I walked on the hallway to find the room. Finally she screamed really loud as you can hear in my recording that I startes
instantly.
I did this recording with a simple Maxfiled mp3 player with a build-in-
microphone of lousy quality.
She was extremely loud and had a ot of fun as to be heard. I tried to
optimize the file with audacity with different grades of amplification and
in different combinations of filters - but I am a rookie with this tool, the
file got worse and worse.
So in order that one of you semiprofessional guys could optimize this nice
recording I will send the original version.
Within the first minute and the last minute you hear me placing the recorder before their door und walking away -same at the end picking it up and walking away. There is a passage of noisy screams in the beginning followed by a longer and silent sequence. I guess some filtering could help us to hear what happened meanwhile. The third quarter is a sequence of her intense cumming and in the end they`re talkin and playing around.
After this session the young couple took a shower and walked out of the
hotel to dance in a disco I suppose. They went back to their hotelroom 2,5
hours later at 4 o`clock but seemed to fell asleep instantly or they had
been enjoying themselves quiet noiseless. No more noises in the early
morning
I saw them for a late brakfast this morning, they were german. He could be in the Midtwenties, tall with black coloured hair; she was a bit younger,
quiet tall, long tall legs, nice body, long blond hair, nice face, small
breasts, looked athletic.
ENJOY
scout
Scout
-
- Member
- Posts: 83
- Joined: 30 May 2007 22:14
Thanks to YEPPIE
Thanks o YEPPIE for the fast job!
Indeed - it is my first own recording - I had the luck to have my hotelroom a few doors next to a real loud woman. In the past years I heard a few comparable audio sensations but never had a recording device to catch it.
This time the luck was on my side! And otherwise there were a few hundred hotel nights when I did not hear anyone. For my future hotel nights I am prepared with an functional audio recorder in my pocket.
Nevertheless I would e happy if anyone of you SSL`s could manage to shape this ETAP BREMEN file a bit...
Thank you!
scout
Indeed - it is my first own recording - I had the luck to have my hotelroom a few doors next to a real loud woman. In the past years I heard a few comparable audio sensations but never had a recording device to catch it.
This time the luck was on my side! And otherwise there were a few hundred hotel nights when I did not hear anyone. For my future hotel nights I am prepared with an functional audio recorder in my pocket.
Nevertheless I would e happy if anyone of you SSL`s could manage to shape this ETAP BREMEN file a bit...
Thank you!
scout
- Dinky Digger
- Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 21 Dec 2005 00:01
-
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 07 Jan 2006 03:12
-
- Member
- Posts: 83
- Joined: 30 May 2007 22:14
Thanks for the editing.
I know it takes a lot of time and work to get such a result.
I think you made it more audible. I am not an audio engineer, it would be interesting to know, if a real pro with real professional equipment, software could clean such a file of all distorbing noises... and reduce it to the sound we liked to hear. Meanwhile I have been searching and informing myself with some audiophil recording websites. But all theses semiprofessionals members of these forums say that in their opinion only a perfect recording (perhaps studio recording) could bring a perfect file.
So we have to stay continuing and enjoying our poor quality files... )
Regards
Scout
I know it takes a lot of time and work to get such a result.
I think you made it more audible. I am not an audio engineer, it would be interesting to know, if a real pro with real professional equipment, software could clean such a file of all distorbing noises... and reduce it to the sound we liked to hear. Meanwhile I have been searching and informing myself with some audiophil recording websites. But all theses semiprofessionals members of these forums say that in their opinion only a perfect recording (perhaps studio recording) could bring a perfect file.
So we have to stay continuing and enjoying our poor quality files... )
Regards
Scout
-
- Knight
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: 20 Dec 2005 12:43
- x 26
Hey Scout - first of all nice catch man... a job well done!
I meant to have a shot at cleaning this up, but Mike beat me to it and I wouldn't have done much different to him.
What you were saying about pro gear is an interesting debate. I've had chance to play around with trying to maximise sound with some crazily expensive studio hardware and software plugins, and to my ears, was still working within roughly the same improvement boundries as a copy of audacity. The difference, I think, would come from the gear used to capture the source. Its usually fair to say that the better the mic/recorder, the more accurate the representation of what your ears were hearing at the time is, and the more chance you've got of improving that. Trouble is, our ears are pretty good as mics, and we've got the added bonus of being able to focus our minds in on the part of our surroundings that we want to pay the most attention too... no mic can do that. Personally I'm a voyeur at heart, so the sounds that are tricky to hear the good stuff and the ones that haven't had the environment screwed with too much are the ones that do it for me. If you prefer the action to be much clearer, then you'll find yourself disappointed often with motel/neighbor style stuff. That said, there's a lot of us hear who won't be, so keep the recorder handy!!
thanks again for sharing, and may your luck hold for the next hotel trip...
Sc0tt-uk
I meant to have a shot at cleaning this up, but Mike beat me to it and I wouldn't have done much different to him.
What you were saying about pro gear is an interesting debate. I've had chance to play around with trying to maximise sound with some crazily expensive studio hardware and software plugins, and to my ears, was still working within roughly the same improvement boundries as a copy of audacity. The difference, I think, would come from the gear used to capture the source. Its usually fair to say that the better the mic/recorder, the more accurate the representation of what your ears were hearing at the time is, and the more chance you've got of improving that. Trouble is, our ears are pretty good as mics, and we've got the added bonus of being able to focus our minds in on the part of our surroundings that we want to pay the most attention too... no mic can do that. Personally I'm a voyeur at heart, so the sounds that are tricky to hear the good stuff and the ones that haven't had the environment screwed with too much are the ones that do it for me. If you prefer the action to be much clearer, then you'll find yourself disappointed often with motel/neighbor style stuff. That said, there's a lot of us hear who won't be, so keep the recorder handy!!
thanks again for sharing, and may your luck hold for the next hotel trip...
Sc0tt-uk